Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009 · Normal

Arceus #P-ARCEUS-4THGRADEWINNER, Normal, Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009

Japanese edition

Card number: #P-ARCEUS-4THGRADEWINNER
Rarity: Promo
Finish: Promo

Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009 NormalDC9PPARCEUS4THGRADEWINNER:EN

TKRDC9PPARCEUS4THGRADEWINNER:EN-P8

Grading toolPro

TCGBerg fair value· PSA 8

$15,625

Our estimate of this card's fair value, calculated from recorded sales.

Sales evidenceSparse

Based on 1 recorded sale. Latest sale: Mar 21, 2025.

30D performance0.0%

30D: · 0.0%
YTD: · 0.0%
Market cap: $15.6K
Volatility: 0.0%

Last sale (Mar 21, 2025)Last sale

$15,625

PSA 8 · Mar 21, 2025

0.0% at TCGBerg fair value

5-sale avg

$15,625

last 5 sales

Population · PSA 8

graded copies

TCGBerg fair value · PSA 8

$15,625

30D0.0%YTD0.0%

Sales evidenceSparse

Based on 1 recorded sale. Latest sale: Mar 21, 2025.

Market cap

$15.6K

fair value x population

Population

graded copies

Last sale

$15,625

0.0% vs fair

5-sale avg

$15,625

recent sales

GradingPro

Price history

Open terminalPro

Weekly fair value for PSA 8. Shaded area is the confidence band: how precisely we can pin the value; it tightens as more sales confirm it. Dots are individual sales.

TCGBerg fair value · PSA 8

Oct 5, 202552 weekly pointsSep 27, 2026

Behind the scenes

What goes into this price, and how much we know.

All grades matrix

Every grade we track for this printing. Click any column header to sort; the rightmost column jumps you to listings for that grade.

PSA8$15,625
1d 0.0%7d 0.0%30d 0.0%
Pop
1
Mcap
$15.6K
Evidence
Sparse
Last
$15,625


PSA8	$15,625	1	$15.6K	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	-	Sparse	$15,6252y ago

TCGBerg fair value by grade

Value at each grade and ungraded condition, on a log scale that spans the full range from the lowest grade at $15.6K up to gem-mint at $15.6K. Log scale. Tap a row to switch the whole page.

Population & rarity

1 graded copies of Arceus Normal across 1 grades. The selected grade is highlighted.

PSA 8

1 · 100%

PSA 8 makes up 100% of graded copies: 1 of 1. It’s the most common grade for this card.

Relative valuation vs. index

How PSA 8 has moved relative to Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009 · Composite since May 17, 2026. Both indexed to 100 at the index’s inception. Card underperformed by 59.8 pp.

About Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009Parent set

This printing in the context of its parent set: total set cap and this printing's share of it.

Browse all sets →

Set total cap

$3.30M

across all printings

This printing's share

0.5%

of total set cap

Implied printing cap

$15.6K

share × set cap

Browse all sets →

Arceus - 4th Grade Winner at PSA 8 carries a TCGBerg fair value of $15,625 as of 2026-09-26. A graded population of 1 copies sits behind the PSA 8 grade. The PSA 8 valuation rests on sparse sales evidence.

Show more analysisAnalysis, commentary & FAQ

PSA 8 commentary

The TCGBerg fair value of a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner is $15,625 as of 2026-09-26. 1 copies have been graded at this level. This valuation rests on sparse sales evidence. The most recent recorded sale was $15,625 on 2025-03-21.

PSA 8 - frequently asked

What is the TCGBerg fair value of a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner?

$15,625 as of 2026-09-26, our model-derived fair value for a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner based on recent graded sales.

How rare is a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner?

1 copies have been graded at PSA 8, the graded population behind this atom.

Frequently asked

What is the TCGBerg fair value of a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner?: $15,625 as of 2026-09-26, our model-derived fair value for a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner based on recent graded sales.
How rare is a PSA 8 Arceus - 4th Grade Winner?: 1 copies have been graded at PSA 8, the graded population behind this atom.

Every printing of Arceus and the indices that include this card in their constituent basket.

Indices containing this card

Parent set

Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009

Set total cap

$399.7K

PSA8

$15,625

$15.6K

0.0%

Sparse

$15,6252y ago

Arceus #P-ARCEUS-4THGRADEWINNER, Normal, Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009

Behind the scenesHow the published fair value for this grade was produced: the estimates that fed it, their share of the starting mix, and every recorded change afterwards. It describes one saved calculation, not a live recomputation.

All grades matrix

Population & rarityHow Arceus's graded copies are spread across grades. Each bar is the number of copies graded at that grade; the percentage is that grade's share of the total graded population. Fewer copies at a grade = scarcer = a scarcity premium.

Relative valuation vs. indexBoth series are indexed to 100 at May 17, 2026, the index’s inception date, not the start of the selected range. A divergence means the card has outperformed or underperformed the index since then, by exactly the percentage-point gap.

About Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009Parent set

Analysis

PSA 8 commentary

PSA 8 - frequently asked

Related

Indices containing this card

Parent set

Behind the scenesHow the published fair value for this grade was produced: the estimates that fed it, their share of the starting mix, and every recorded change afterwards. It describes one saved calculation, not a live recomputation.

All grades matrix

Population & rarityHow Arceus's graded copies are spread across grades. Each bar is the number of copies graded at that grade; the percentage is that grade's share of the total graded population. Fewer copies at a grade = scarcer = a scarcity premium.

Relative valuation vs. indexBoth series are indexed to 100 at May 17, 2026, the index’s inception date, not the start of the selected range. A divergence means the card has outperformed or underperformed the index since then, by exactly the percentage-point gap.

About Japanese Design Contest Promos 2009Parent set

Analysis

PSA 8 commentary

PSA 8 - frequently asked

Related

Indices containing this card

Parent set

Behind the scenes

Population & rarity

Relative valuation vs. index

Behind the scenes

Population & rarity

Relative valuation vs. index